Zhijun He / Writing
野花繁盛处
世界观察 · 秩序沉思 · 田野手记
where wildflowers grow
中文写作 · 微信公众号 whynationsfail · 何智骏（虹霞垂天）
这是我的中文写作。学术论文用英文写，为一小群同行；这些文章用中文写，为另一群人——常常是我的家乡、我的同代人，和走过同一条路的年轻人。
写的多半还是同一件事：秩序如何生成，又如何耗散；一个地方凭什么站得直。只是在这里，它不必先变成一个可发表的命题。
This is my writing in Chinese. The academic work is in English, for a small room of colleagues; these essays are for a different set of readers — often my hometown, my own generation, and the young people who have walked the same road.
Mostly they are about one thing: how order comes into being and how it dissipates, and what allows a place to stand upright. The difference is that here it does not have to become a publishable proposition first.
-
A Thursday seminar at Yale opens on a slide of five questions, the first being what separates research done in Africa from research done about it. The professor, a Kenyan who works at home, answers in cases: a parasite that is the same organism everywhere, but whose local meaning decides whom a family goes to; a famous deworming trial, cheap enough that donors could do the arithmetic in their heads, whose spillover onto neighbouring schools — the very finding that made the arithmetic irresistible — dissolved a decade later once a coding error was corrected, and whose alternating design meant the children who received nothing walked to school each morning beside the children who did; an interview in which the respondent answered her while looking past her, then stepped around her to settle a price with the American colleague — reading a rank order he had read all his life, and reading it accurately. Against these the essay sets Olúfẹ́mi Táíwò's case that modernity's three commitments are nobody's private property, that West African elites were already exercising them before 1884, and that colonial rule froze what it later claimed to have introduced — with anthropology's own birth certificate, a bridewealth ban and the cheaper administration that followed it, supplied by the professor as corroboration. Then the donor who needed Africa not to have changed; the question of whether changing who produces development knowledge changes the number of chairs at the table; the seventy percent who admit they lied in a community court beside the ninety percent who trust its verdict. The author claims the third chair and then names its price — a hundred pages on Rwanda assembled entirely out of other people's fieldwork, three years of sitting in that chair on paper. Whoever bears the cost of being wrong should have a vote; the bill is mailed to the same address every time, and the person who writes it rarely lives there.
读原文 · Read in Chinese -
A necktie in a shop that has stood on York Street since 1902 — Japanese-owned since 1986, woven with the words TAKE IVY — opens a chain of cases in which a tradition is preserved, refined, or rewritten from outside: Chinese schools in Southeast Asia that froze the script at the moment of departure; a Chinatown that rebuilt itself as spectacle to earn the right to stay; a domestic fashion revival that had to be seen in New York before it could be sold at home; an Islamic museum whose essence was distilled by a ninety-year-old modernist born in Guangzhou; a Buddhism so thoroughly remade in China that the Chinese version is what the world now receives; and a cartoon frog with no original left to consult. The essay closes by taking the word "wilds" apart: there is no periphery except the one a centre invents in order to know itself. What survives is not what was preserved intact but what failed to translate — and the residue is the proof that something other than yourself is really there.
读原文 · Read in Chinese -
A day at the WHO country office in Beijing, recorded as a field note. The representative, a social anthropologist by training, is asked whether China still needs the WHO, and rephrases the question into whether the WHO can still add value: a zero-sum question about survival becomes a positive-sum question about contribution. The essay counts six such translations in a single day and argues they are not a personal habit of speech but the grammar an organisation must use when it is forbidden to name an adversary. It marks the one occasion the grammar broke — an air quality index of 400, a harm that was shared, immediate and undeniable — and asks why slow, dispersed, statistical harm can never be spoken in the same register. A simulation game that afternoon supplies the other half of the machine: playing a rich country, the author buys conscience with transfers, sees the cliff, brakes early, is punished for it, and floors the accelerator in the final round. The pool collapses, and the penalty is levied per capita on countries whose contributions to the collapse were nothing alike. One grammar makes people disappear into language; the other makes responsibility disappear into arithmetic.
读原文 · Read in Chinese -
A close rereading of New Structural Economics against a widely circulated Chinese critique of it. The essay works through four charges — that the theory is old wine in a new bottle, that it has only one gear, that its "continuum" is borrowed, that it cannot be falsified — and shows where each misses the structure it means to bring down, including the fact that several scholars said to have been plagiarised were invited by Lin to rebut him in a volume he himself edited. It then turns to what the critique never reached: four rooms the theory has honestly left unfinished. The second — how a state comes to see what it is trying to build, without being captured by what it has identified — is the question I met in Rwanda under another name.
读原文 · Read in Chinese -
A letter from Yale reaches a coal town in Heilongjiang with the city's name misspelled — proof that a hand, not a database, addressed it. From that envelope the essay traces the route backward: slag heaps that stay warm under snow, a village in Jiangsu that stitches itself and needed no one from outside to do the stitching, two Kenyan teachers giving a first lesson on Africa in a Chinese classroom, and the question underneath all of it — why the same programme, on the same terms, shelters people in one place and runs them over in another.
读原文 · Read in Chinese -
A seminar opens with a question — why do you eat? — and the answer, that you are replacing dissipated energy, becomes the frame for everything after it. The essay reads development as work against entropy and distinguishes four faces of the second law: the pump that holds a periphery at high entropy by design; the room with no demon to sort it; the dragon's scale that kills whoever acquires the knowledge to sort; and the machine that has forgotten what it was built for. Then dissipative structures and what grew out of Rwanda's ruins, Braudel's three tempos, and why an institution that succeeded through discipline may have to undergo a phase transition to survive its own success — a transition whose friction is always paid for by someone. It stops where the physics runs out, on the question the analysis cannot answer: how does the person doing this keep going.
读原文 · Read in Chinese
文章以中文发表于微信公众号「野花繁盛处」（whynationsfail），署名虹霞垂天。英文说明为便于非中文读者理解而写，非原文翻译。 · The essays are written and published in Chinese; the English notes are descriptions, not translations. · Back to the main page